EN
FR
Paul Lambert

Hello @Paul Lambert :) Hope you are doing well.

We've prepared 4 personalized images for you to show you the new look oh the #HeroScore widget. Now I would like to ask your vote for your favorite one:

1.)

2.)

 

3.)

4.)

 

I just wanted to say wp to everyone that took part in the Battle of Malta HH, and wp to RKH for running such a great promo.

GL to everyone involved. Like getting it in AK v QQ... it's all down to the poker gods now ;)

P.S. last chance to 'like' my river play :P

http://www.rankinghero.com/en/players/380799/paul-lambert/activity/2363905.html


Paul Lambert - Blog Post - Ranking HeroImagine you’re in Malta playing the 2015 PokerListings Battle of Malta. Lucky you!www.rankinghero.com

 

Here is the hand:

Imagine you’re in Malta playing the 2015 PokerListings Battle of Malta. Lucky you!

You are close to the bubble.
The blinds are 1,000/2,000/200.

 

Preflop

Everyone folds to the player in middle position. He’s an aggressive Swedish pro, with 136,250 chips, and he raises to 5,000. Two hands earlier, the villain lost 20% of his stack on a bluff on the river.

You’re on the button with K♥K♦ and a stack of 130,500.

 

You decide to 3-bet 12,000 chips.

The small blind and the big blind both fold.
Villain calls.

The pot is now 28,800 chips.

 

Flop

The dealer reveals Q♠K♠7♠.

Villain bets 12,000.

The action is back on you. You now have a 118,500 stack.

You raise his bet to 28,000 chips.

Villain decides to call.



Turn

The turn card is 3♠

Villain checks.


The pot is 84,800. You have a 90,500 stack

On villain’s check on the turn, you bet 24,000 chips.
And, once again, he calls.

 


River

The river is the 2♥.

The pot is now 132,800.


Villain decides to push all his stack in.

He covers you by 6,000 chips.

 

What do you do?

Right, I'm sure everyone else is scared to be the first one to post on this because on the face of it, it seems like quite a tough spot, so I'll throw my hat in the ring...

Essentially this all comes down to whether the villian is turning some weaker made hands into bluffs due to our small bet potentially being seen as weakness. However, our small bet on the turn could also be seen as very strong and not wanting to 'lose our customer'. In my opinion, he no longer has any airballs on the river, he wouldn't call even a tiny bet on the turn with say JT (no spade) on a 4 spade board.

His range now consists mostly of value hands/flushes which beat us where he wants us to make a hero call knowing that if he checks we will definitely be checking back. I've pretty much ruled out most worse value hands but it's always a good idea to allow for a couple of combos of these hands (KQ/K7/Q7/77) because no one plays the same hand in the same way 100% of the time. So there is still a small chance he has a few of the above hands which he could jam the river with as a bluff, sensing weakness....

However, he has to be trying to make us fold such an insanely narrow range, basically, KK/QQ because he beats most non flush hands. We also still need to remember that using combinatorics and the fact we have KK makes it very very unlikely he has one of these value hands to turn into a bluff. Whereas there are ALOT of combos of Ax with the ace of spades (all of which probably play it exactly like this on every street), not to mention the potential he's going for thin value with the 2nd nuts with something like Jx with the J of spades

From a purely chip EV point of view, we would be calling around 60,000 to win 190,000 so we are getting roughly 3-1 meaning we need him to be bluffing around 25% of the time to make it a call. In reality though we need to be correct a little more often than that because this is the stone bubble and we are calling all-in. It's all very good to say 'we need to play for the win' and that is very true, that is the way to play tournaments, but at the same time that doesn't mean ICM and making it into the money should be totally disregarded, it's still a consideration that needs to be taken into account. On top of that consideration, I think his range doesn't involve enough bluffs to make it a +EV chip call alone, nevermind a +£EV call.

It's easy to say 'we had a plan, we had a monster pre and on the flop, he's aggressive and we wanted to give him the chance to hang himself so now we have to go with it' but that's not always the case. A poker hand changes on every single street and our plans need to adapt to that, sometimes we have a gameplan for a hand then a horrible runout puts a spanner in the works and we need to know when it's time to change plan.

All these extra bits of info... he's swedish, aggressive, just lost 20% of his stack etc, these are all nice, useful pieces of information to help us make the best decision we can, but they can't just over-ride our other bigger tools like the ability to hand read.

In short, we had what was shaping up to be a great spot for us, things turned a little sour in the middle and now we've been left in a spot where the only option is to fold and focus on spinning up our 30xBB


#HandMalta & ##BOMriver.

 

5 Comments Display all

That's just one of the beautiful things about poker innit, everyone can have different views/opinions, doesn't mean either of us are right or wrong. We just assigned the villian different ranges and so that changes everything.

haha cool man, i just saw your quote marks ie;  " hanging himself" and assumed you were going all "TwoPlusTwo" on me lolol.

Yeah 100% agree with the fold for sure, i'm just one of these difficult people who try and disect things into tiny little pieces for fun...

Just my inner geek i guess. If you were genuinely not quoting my ramble, i apologize for my rant, it is indeed a bit of fun.

 "That's just one of the beautiful things about poker innit, everyone can have different views/opinions, doesn't mean either of us are right or wrong. We just assigned the villian different ranges and so that changes everything."

+1 to this....

From my perspective you are an expert, if i can get even slightly close to where you are now, i'd be very happy, by which time you'll have long moved on and  started crushing "The Big Game" hopefully ; )

(*I'd get coaching from you if you offered it)

take it easy dude gl gg

 

<3

So I made a commitment at the start of this year that I was finally gonna leave the house once in a while and get out to play some more live poker. I love playing live, for me it's a break from the online grind and is a lot more fun being able to actually socialise with other human beings at my table...

Long story short, it's nearly June and I've totally failed so far, think I've played 2 live comps all year!

Someone just reminded me about it so I thought I'd get back on it and have a quick browse of the dates for upcoming tours in the UK.

For anyone that doesn't know I live in Oxfordshire now but originally I'm from Liverpool and lived there up until about 6 years ago. So I'm looking at playing the £220 GPS in Liverpool (I get free 'hotels' cos I can stay with my mum) and the £550 GPS in Reading (nice and close to where I live), both coming up in June I believe.

Are there any other RKHers that will be at these events and fancy meeting up for a drink?

Here is the hand:

Imagine you’re in Malta playing the 2015 PokerListings Battle of Malta. Lucky you!

You are close to the bubble.
The blinds are 1,000/2,000/200.

 

Preflop

Everyone folds to the player in middle position. He’s an aggressive Swedish pro, with 136,250 chips, and he raises to 5,000. Two hands earlier, the villain lost 20% of his stack on a bluff on the river.

You’re on the button with K♥K♦ and a stack of 130,500.

 

You decide to 3-bet 12,000 chips.

The small blind and the big blind both fold.
Villain calls.

The pot is now 28,800 chips.

 

Flop

The dealer reveals Q♠K♠7♠.

Villain bets 12,000.

The action is back on you. You now have a 118,500 stack.

You raise his bet to 28,000 chips.

Villain decides to call.



Turn

The turn card is 3♠

Villain checks.


The pot is 84,800. You have a 90,500 stack.

 

What do you do?

This is certainly not the best turn card in the deck but it's not a total nightmare situation yet...

This is one of those spots that shows how great it is to have position in a hand because now we can keep the pot under control.

Again, like on all streets, we now have to re-assess the villian's range, how the turn card has connected with that range and so figure out what the best course of action is.

There is absolutely no good reason to bet here at all. We removed most made value hands from his range after his donklead on the flop, but now we've raised and he's just flatted on such a wet flop then I think we definitely now have to discount all those hands like KQ/Q7/K7/77 because they are strong yet vulnerable on the flop and on such a wet flop are hands which he would almost definitely shove knowing he can get action from worse or (happily) fold out high equity hands.

The fact he just flatted our flop raise cements the idea further that his flop range was pretty much exclusively draws. 

Betting the turn would be a disaster, we would be turning our hand into a bluff (a very bad one) because we are never going to get called by worse now and there are literally zero hands better than ours that we can make fold. I don't give him credit for having many bare gutshots on the flop, I think he'd only lead with gutshots that had 1 spade so they are now be ahead and aren't folding. Any 1 spade hand that called flop is of course ahead and isn't folding, so pretty much the only hand we fold out is JT (without a spade) and that has very small equity against us anyway.

Very easy check-back on the turn. This is also balanced by the fact we aren't always gonna continue firing with hands like Ax (with ace of spades) because as above, it's very hard for him to have a worse hand to call with so a check-back here doesn't need to mean we're turning our hand face up.

#HandMalta & #BOMturn.

 

Even more confused now. I just looked on my profile and it does seem to have accepted the fact I've added all my online aliases (screenshot below) but it doesn't seem to have any of my online results... are they supposed to be greyed out?

I also have an online score but I dunno why cos it doesn't seem to have my results...

5 Comments Display all

Hey, we don't display online results, some sites do this very well. We only use your stats to compute points for the HeroScore.
We've noted some refresh bugs so bare with us as we improve the feature. @Laurent Gomez is the man :)

Ah ok, that makes sense then. I've taken the last week off anyway so I'm sure it'll be up to date. Cheers for letting me know

All your logins have now been processed, it was only taking some time.

All is grey because the design wanted it that way ;)

Hey guys,

I mentioned I might start writing some strategy articles and the early feedback flagged up a big leak I think a ton of players have which is bet sizing, so that's as good a place as any to get started...

A few things to point out before I start... This guide is only going to discuss postflop betting and certain parts may seem more relevant to cash games where stacks are deeper but most of it applies to any hand you play in any format of poker.
 
Last point before we really get started but a very important one... Don't use the post-flop betting buttons (½ pot, ¾ pot and full pot). If you're always using these buttons then it just shows you're not thinking enough about how much you're betting and why you chose that particular amount.
 
===============================================================================
 
It might sound like a long list and a lot to think about but most of these things either already are or will become second nature with practice so here are the factors you need to take into account when deciding how much to bet...
 
1) Our hand and our perceived range
2) The board
3) The opponent's range
4) Reads on the opponent
5) Stack/Pot Ratio
6) Number of opponents
 
As a general 'default' I'd suggest all of your bets being in the range of 60-70% of the pot but the factors above may mean you should increase or decrease that figure.
 
==============================================================================
 
Our hand and our perceived range - Well the first part of this is pretty self explanatory. The second part is only relevant when you're playing a pot against an opponent that you think is actually putting you on a range. If they are then you should think about what our range looks like to the opponent. Depending on how strong/weak our perceived range is V their range, you can adapt your sizing to get the result you want.
 
The board - The board texture is one of the most important factors in choosing a bet sizing. On very dry boards we want to bet smaller than normal because flops like K27r are impossible for your opponent to have any immediate (non-backdoor) draws and it's a flop that is going to miss most ranges a lot of the time. For this reason betting smaller achieves two things:
 
1) When we are value betting, a smaller bet will get called by a wider range (so we get value more often)
 
2) When we are bluffing, it's much cheaper to do so and a smaller bet should be just as effective because it's such a hard flop for your opponent to hit. The smaller our bet, the less often it has to work to be +EV
 
Conversely on very wet flops we should bet bigger than normal. Wet flops like 89Qss or AJThh hit the range of hands that most people like to play way more than the flop mentioned above. On flops like this, people will have lots of hands like 1pr, 2pr, 1pr + FD, 1pr + straight draw, sets, nut flush draws, OESD. So again the reason we go bigger is two fold:
 
1) When we're value betting, it's SO much more likely people have a hand they want to continue with, so we wanna get more value from those hands with a bigger bet
 
2) When we're bluffing, again people have hands they want to continue with more often and we need to put more pressure on them to get them off the lower end of their ranges.
 
The opponent's range - Putting your opponent on a range allows you to have an idea of how strong/weak they are in a hand. If judging by earlier streets we can pretty much guarantee they have a strong hand that they're not gonna fold and we're sitting there with a massive hand then obv we can go really big with our sizing. Conversely if we think they have some sort of made hand but it can't stand much heat like 2nd pr/TPNK and we don't want them to fold, then we can go a little bit smaller to keep in these weaker hands.
 
Reads on the opponent - Reads on an opponent are very important and you'll only get an idea for what you can get away with by trial and error (and watching opponents when they play hands with other people), but obviously some players are a bit more on the stationy side than others. Against good players it can be important to be balanced with your sizings, against others they just simply won't notice. If they don't even notice you betting 60% pot with bluffs and 80% for value then go for it. This especially applies to microstakes cash... exploiting people's mistakes is far more important than being balanced against people that won't notice.
 
Stack/Pot Ratio - Unless stacks are vv deep when it's just not possible, we generally want to be setting ourselves up so that when we get to the river we can (although we don't necessarily have to) shove for a little under a pot sized bet. Not only does it mean we've set ourselves up to get it in by the river without overbetting but it also puts the max pressure on the opponent knowing that if he calls the turn, he is likely to be facing a bet for the rest of his stack on the river. Also, if you get into a 3bet pot with someone who only has say 40xBB and you flop very very strong then you can often go something like 30% pot, 30% pot, 30% pot and that's enough to get it in by the river while keeping his range as wide as possible... going smaller in these shallower stacked pots also allows us to run multi street bluffs and still get away. So you should be thinking right from the start 'what kind of sizings do I need to use to get it in by the river?'
 
Number of opponents - Generally, the more people there are in the pot, the bigger we should go. When we're going for value then there are just that many more ranges out there to have hit the board so higher chance of getting calls and so we get max value going bigger. Multi way pots are harder to get folds from everyone so when we're bluffing we're also using bigger sizings to put max pressure on our opponents.
 
This felt a bit rushed and I'm no Galfond so no doubt I missed stuff or didn't explain certain things very well so feel free to ask any questions in the comments box and I'll be happy to answer.
6 Comments Display all

Great article, thanks for this!

Cheers @Nicolas Levi 

I'm gonna be doing some more of these kinda basic strategy guides aruond the fundamentals of the game soon, just need some ideas about what people wnat to see.

 Hi Paul

Would love to see some "showdown theory"  explained at some point....i struggle with the maths on this subject quite a lot...

IE; When is it better to turn my hand into a bluff rather than take a showdown?

Am working on this at the moment, would love to see how others approach this...

Cheers bud : )